<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Banks Project Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebanksproject.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebanksproject.com</link>
	<description>Cincinnati's urban revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:30:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog Action Day &#8211; Poverty by thebanksproject</title>
		<link>http://thebanksproject.com/2008/10/15/blog-action-day-poverty/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>thebanksproject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebanksproject.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Saggy Wheels - Thanks for your comment.

To answer your question, I do believe in what I wrote.  There was early discussion of Section 8 being forced upon the developers of The Banks, but I haven&#039;t found any updates as to whether this component was agreed upon.  I&#039;m not advocating for Section 8 apartments with views of the river, but mixed-income developments have proven successful in other US cities.

I would hope that a project of this magnitude would cater to the needs of all Cincinnatians.  After all, we&#039;re paying for the project.  The interests of urban re-developers is often at odds with the interests of the populous because there&#039;s little money to be made in the poor.

New posts are on the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saggy Wheels &#8211; Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>To answer your question, I do believe in what I wrote.  There was early discussion of Section 8 being forced upon the developers of The Banks, but I haven&#8217;t found any updates as to whether this component was agreed upon.  I&#8217;m not advocating for Section 8 apartments with views of the river, but mixed-income developments have proven successful in other US cities.</p>
<p>I would hope that a project of this magnitude would cater to the needs of all Cincinnatians.  After all, we&#8217;re paying for the project.  The interests of urban re-developers is often at odds with the interests of the populous because there&#8217;s little money to be made in the poor.</p>
<p>New posts are on the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blog Action Day &#8211; Poverty by saggy wheels</title>
		<link>http://thebanksproject.com/2008/10/15/blog-action-day-poverty/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>saggy wheels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebanksproject.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-13</guid>
		<description>are you serious?  please tell me you didn&#039;t believe any of this article when you wrote it because you know absolutely none of it will come true.  whats the deal with no new posts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you serious?  please tell me you didn&#8217;t believe any of this article when you wrote it because you know absolutely none of it will come true.  whats the deal with no new posts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8230;and groceries for all by nina</title>
		<link>http://thebanksproject.com/2008/06/28/groceries/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebanksproject.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to know more; I think that knowing which grocery franchise could move in would communicate a great deal about the expected patronage of this new store, as well as the diversity of products and services that will be available to downtown residents at this location.  Valuable information toward forming an opinion regarding this specific development.

In reading other comments (on the original article, rather than the blog), I have gathered that many are focused on the affect such a grocery store might have on decisions by potential residents to move downtown, and I think these may be missing the point.  As a current OTR resident (14th St), I can say with absolute certainty that to have a grocer within safe walking distance of my home would enable me to build a greater sense of belonging to my neighborhood and local community.  That being said, I don&#039;t think that by building a grocery store on the banks of the river, either I or my fellow OTR residents will have the opportunity to realize this benefit; it is still too far.

Good theory, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know more; I think that knowing which grocery franchise could move in would communicate a great deal about the expected patronage of this new store, as well as the diversity of products and services that will be available to downtown residents at this location.  Valuable information toward forming an opinion regarding this specific development.</p>
<p>In reading other comments (on the original article, rather than the blog), I have gathered that many are focused on the affect such a grocery store might have on decisions by potential residents to move downtown, and I think these may be missing the point.  As a current OTR resident (14th St), I can say with absolute certainty that to have a grocer within safe walking distance of my home would enable me to build a greater sense of belonging to my neighborhood and local community.  That being said, I don&#8217;t think that by building a grocery store on the banks of the river, either I or my fellow OTR residents will have the opportunity to realize this benefit; it is still too far.</p>
<p>Good theory, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
